risk-based-hierarchy

Type: pitch
Tags: amigosgovernanceriskequityhierarchycompensation
Created: Thu Oct 30 2025 00:00:00 GMT+0000 (Coordinated Universal Time)

Risk-Based Hierarchy System

A revolutionary compensation and governance model that rewards actual risk-taking, not just participation.

Core Principle

Risk = Value. The more existential risk you take, the more you should own and control.

Types of Risk (Debt)

1. Financial Risk

2. Career Risk

3. Relationship Risk

4. Time Risk

Risk Scoring Formula

Risk Score = (Financial Risk × 3) + (Career Risk × 4) + (Relationship Risk × 2) + (Time Risk × 1)

Example Calculations

Early Engineer (High Salary)

Early Engineer (Half Salary)

Technical Co-founder

CEO/Visionary Founder

Compensation Structure

Three Pillars

  1. Salary - Covers living expenses (inverse to risk)
  2. Equity - Rewards risk (proportional to risk score)
  3. Tokens - Rewards contribution (based on usage/impact)

Distribution Model

Equity % = (Individual Risk Score / Total Risk Score Pool) × Equity Pool
Token Weight = Base Allocation × (1 + Risk Multiplier)
Voting Power = Equity % + (Token Holdings × Time Locked)

Special Cases

Organizations (like Samourai Coop)

Individual Contributors in Corporations

Retroactive Risk Recognition

When someone’s past actions created value:

Zooma’s Samourai Example

Risk Analysis of Zooma’s Commitment:

This demonstrates maximum risk across all categories - exactly what should be rewarded most.

Implementation Phases

Phase 1: Founding Team

Phase 2: Early Employees

Phase 3: Investor Integration

Phase 4: Ecosystem Partners

Governance Integration

Voting Power Formula

Votes = (Risk Score × 0.4) + (Token Holdings × 0.3) + (Contribution Score × 0.3)

Decision Rights by Risk Tier

Anti-Gaming Mechanisms

Verification Required

Decay Functions

Benefits

For Risk-Takers

For Cautious Contributors

For Investors

Examples in Practice

Scenario 1: Series A Hire

Two Options Presented:

  1. Market salary (0 risk) = 0.1% equity
  2. Half salary (2 risk) = 0.5% equity
  3. No salary (4 risk) = 1.5% equity

Scenario 2: Strategic Partnership

Samourai Coop wants to contribute:

Scenario 3: Acquisition Risk

Founder sells previous company to fund Amigos:

Vesting Philosophy

Core Principle: Risk determines shares, vesting ensures commitment, flexibility enables life.

Universal Vesting Rules

Founding Members Special Rules

Founding Cliff: 6 months (vs 12 for others)
Founding Vesting: 3 years (vs 4 for others)
Founding Acceleration: 2x on major milestones

VC Carve-Out Structure

VC Cliff: 0 months (immediate start)
VC Vesting: 2 years (shorter commitment)
VC Conditions: Value-add metrics required

Employee Flexibility

Standard Structure:

Life Pause Option:

Why Monthly Vesting?

Quarterly vesting creates perverse incentives:

Monthly vesting means:

The Philosophy

Traditional tech rewards two extremes:

  1. Pure capital (VCs with no operational risk)
  2. Pure execution (employees with guaranteed salaries)

We reward the middle ground:

This creates a new class: Risk-Taking Builders.

Employment Flexibility Model

Life Happens Policy

Principle: We only want people who want to be here. Life is complex.

Pause Options

  1. Sabbatical Pause (3-12 months)

    • Vesting pauses, not terminated
    • Keep health benefits (if applicable)
    • Guaranteed re-entry at same level
    • Strike price preserved
    • Risk score maintained
  2. Project Pause (1-6 months)

    • Try a new project/startup
    • Vesting continues at 50% rate
    • Can return with lessons learned
    • “Boomerang bonus” if successful elsewhere
  3. Life Event Pause (As needed)

    • Family, health, personal
    • Case-by-case basis
    • Maximum flexibility
    • No questions asked

Re-entry Advantages

Returning contributors get:

Why This Matters

Individual Recognition in Organizations

Dual Participation Model

For individuals in organizations (like corporates):

  1. Organization Level - Company gets allocation
  2. Individual Level - Person gets personal allocation

Example: Corporate Employee Contributing

Jane at MegaCorp contributes to Amigos:
- MegaCorp allocation: Based on resources provided
- Jane's allocation: Based on personal risk/contribution
- If Jane leaves MegaCorp: Keeps personal allocation
- If MegaCorp exits: Jane keeps contributing

Recognition Mechanisms

Next Steps

  1. Score all current contributors
  2. Create risk assessment tool
  3. Legal framework for implementation
  4. Transparent risk ledger
  5. Regular risk reassessment
  6. Design pause/resume workflows
  7. Create alumni network structure

The goal: Make risk-taking not just rewarded, but celebrated and systematic - while recognizing that builders are humans with complex lives.

Sources

See also

← Back to Knowledge Base